[script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-6169568552679962" crossorigin="anonymous"][/script]

Torn Between Windsurf vs. Cursor? So Was I Till I Went All In


After spending time researching each Windsurf (previously Codeium) and Cursor, the 2 standard AI coding assistant software program, I wished to interrupt down what every brings to the desk. On this comparability, I’ll cowl options, pricing, and sincere person suggestions that can assist you resolve which one may suit your workflow higher than the opposite.

Windsurf is an AI-native coding platform by Exafunction (constructing on the previous Codeium). It presents code autocompletion, evaluation, and even an entire AI-powered built-in growth setting (IDE). It contains options resembling Cascade, an agent that completely understands your codebase. 

Equally, Cursor is a standalone AI code editor from Anysphere. It makes use of AI to autocomplete and refactor code whereas offering a complete coding setting with options resembling multi-line edits and built-in entry to massive language fashions (LLMs). 

Each instruments intention to make use of AI to speed up coding velocity. In case you worth a free or low-cost resolution that integrates together with your present IDE, Windsurf is an interesting possibility. If you’d like a completely AI-integrated coding setting and are keen to pay for it, Cursor is a greater guess.

Windsurf is finest for context consciousness, person interface, and IDE integration. Cursor and Windsurf carry out equally nicely in code era capabilities and total efficiency.  

Inquisitive about my outcomes? Let’s dive into how I reached there!

*Windsurf has not too long ago joined Cognition. Some options and performance may change with this acquisition. 

Windsurf vs. Cursor: What options are distinctive to every?

Every instrument has its personal distinctive tackle options, even after they intention to unravel related issues. 

Windsurf vs. Cursor: What’s related? 

Right here’s how the 2 AI code modifying platforms may seem much like some customers: 

  • Language and framework help: Each instruments declare broad help. Windsurf helps over 70 languages, together with Python, JavaScript, and C++, and varied frameworks. Cursor doesn’t listing a number of languages, however since it will possibly import any VSCode extension, it successfully helps any language VSCode can deal with.
  • Neighborhood and help: Windsurf (Codeium) has been round for a bit longer and has a big person base. There’s an energetic Discord and discussion board. The Cursor is newer, with fewer public critiques (solely 4 on G2 on the time of writing), but additionally has a rising person neighborhood.

How I in contrast Windsurf and Cursor: My analysis standards

I in contrast the 2 platforms to determine which instrument is extra appropriate primarily based on characteristic availability and usefulness, pricing, efficiency, context consciousness, and IDE integration. 

I went in-depth into product documentation, guides, boards, and critiques of third-party web sites to discover what’s standing behind the superbly designed and adorned web sites. Aside from this, I watched movies the place specialists in contrast Windsurf and Cursor to get sensible insights. What you see on this article is an goal abstract of my analysis. I’ve tried my finest to maintain the data updated with the most recent. 

Nevertheless, I’ve coated the elemental points of those instruments to make sure that this analysis stays related even sooner or later. 


Windsurf vs. Cursor: How they really carried out in my analysis

On this comparability, I went deep into demos and present documentation on Windsurf and Cursor. Right here’s an summary of my comparability:

Autocomplete and code era capabilities

Each instruments supply superior code autocomplete. Windsurf gives multiline solutions and even automated unit check stubs, using fashions skilled on open-source code. Its Cascade agent fills in massive blocks of code with a single instruction. 

I discovered the AI code completion characteristic to be extremely intuitive and useful in dashing up the coding course of. The solutions it made had been correct and context-aware, suggesting extra environment friendly methods to write down the code. The chat characteristic provided one other standout side, offering fast help and clarification when wanted. It is like having a coding companion prepared to assist always.

Supply: Windsurf

Cursor equally gives AI-driven tab completions and generates code from feedback or prompts. Cursor presents robust customization by way of context guidelines, symlinks, and scaffolding. This permits predictable, constant outcomes throughout massive codebases. Nevertheless, it would produce surface-level output at occasions.

code generation using cursorSupply: Cursor

Winner: Tie

Context consciousness, UI, and IDE integration

Windsurf’s Cascade agent is explicitly constructed to achieve a deep consciousness of your venture. It remembers earlier information you’ve labored on and makes use of that context when making solutions. Cursor, likewise, indexes your codebase and solutions questions on it. It sees how completely different information and elements of your venture work collectively. 

Windsurf presents each plugins and a customized editor. Its plugin works inside VS Code, JetBrains, and different IDEs, giving AI completions the place you already work. Alternatively, Windsurf now options its AI-native IDE, which incorporates all obligatory options. Cursor can also be a standalone software, however it permits importing extensions and keybindings. It is going to will let you import all of your extensions, themes, and keybindings from VS Code with a click on.

Whereas Cursor does not supply a plugin in the identical manner Windsurf does, it gives related performance via its core options and integration with different instruments. 

For customers conversant in Visible Studio Code, they’ll discover it straightforward to work on Cursor because it retains an analogous interface. On the identical time, Windsurf makes it simpler to finish tedious work with its ease of integration into present IDEs. 

Ideally, this comparability can also be a tie. However I personally favored Windsurf’s UI/UX over Cursor’s. What’s extra, some person critiques famous inconsistencies with Cursor’s AI, saying that whereas it’s good at occasions, it will possibly sometimes go off monitor for no cause. 

Winner: Windsurf 🏆

Efficiency 

Builders care about velocity and light-weight operation. Many Windsurf customers reward its efficiency. One reviewer famous: 

“Windsurf may be very quick, and the code solutions are very related to the venture.”

Windsurf Evaluation, Sujeet A, Senior Software program Engineer

In an interview, Varun Mohan, CEO and Co-Founding father of Windsurf, conveyed that Windsurf’s engineers goal sub‑100 ms time‑to‑first‑token and a whole bunch of tokens a second for the era time. Latency issues a ton because it largely determines the willingness to make use of the product.

Then again, Cursor is equally quick, in response to a person’s weblog publish on Medium.

It’s difficult to match these options objectively, as their efficiency largely depends upon the particular use case. That stated, I didn’t see any performance-related complaints for Cursor on G2 as of July 2025.

Winner: Tie

Pricing

Each Windsurf and Cursor have free plans. 

Windsurf presents a two-week free trial of the Professional plan. With the free plan, you obtain 25 immediate credit per 30 days throughout main fashions, together with OpenAI, Claude, Gemini xAI, and extra. The plan presents elective zero information retention, Previews, and one app deployment per day. 

Windsurf’s Professional plan at $15/person/month presents 500 immediate credit per 30 days and 5 app deploys/day. Workforce and Enterprise plans price $30/person/month and $60/person/month. 

Cursor additionally presents a two-week free trial. The Professional plan prices $20/month. It’s appropriate for customers primarily utilizing the Tab with occasional agent utilization. There are two extra particular person plans: Professional+ ($60/month) and Extremely ($200/ month). In case you code daily with brokers, the Professional+ plan is appropriate. In case you’re an influence person utilizing brokers for almost all of coding, the Extremely plan will go well with you one of the best. 

These plans include particular person limits.

Windsurf’s Professional plan prices $15 per 30 days, which is lower than Cursor. Nevertheless, it has limits of as much as 500 credit per 30 days. Cursor Professional prices $20 per 30 days, however should you want utilizing GPT 4.1, it gives as much as 650 requests per 30 days. 

Winner: Tie

Right here’s an summary of how Windsurf and Cursor examine when it comes to AI coding assistant software program options:

Characteristic Winner Why it gained
Autocomplete and code era capabilities Tie Each instruments are able to writing out total capabilities and even scaffolding a easy software from a immediate.
Context consciousness, UI, and IDE integration Windsurf 🏆 Windsurf stands out on account of its user-friendly interface and expertise. 
Efficiency Tie  Each platforms examine nicely when it comes to velocity and light-weight operation.
Pricing Tie Windsurf Professional plan presents 500 credit at $15 per 30 days. Cursor prices $20 per 30 days however presents completely different utilization limits for various AI fashions. 

Windsurf vs. Cursor: Which must you use?

In selecting between Windsurf and Cursor, it typically comes right down to your workflow:

Select Windsurf if: 

You favor a free or low-cost resolution that integrates together with your IDE. Windsurf’s plugin works in all places, and also you get a beneficiant free tier that covers fundamental use. Groups that prioritize privateness or on-premises deployment can lean towards Windsurf, because it presents enterprise self-hosting. 

Listed here are just a few extra insights on Windsurf primarily based on G2 Information: 

  • Windsurf has an honest ease of use (86%) and ease of setup (95%) scores.
  • The platform dominates laptop software program, IT and companies, schooling administration, accounting, and consulting industries.
  • Windsurf excels in interface (81%), code high quality (77%), and enter processing (75%). The platform may battle with neighborhood (70%), documentation (73%), and accuracy (74%). 

Select Cursor if: 

If you’d like a completely AI-integrated coding setting and are keen to pay for it. It looks like an excellent new editor constructed from the bottom up round AI. Its options, resembling multi-line refactoring and deep code search, are onerous to seek out elsewhere.

Cursor had restricted critiques on G2 as of July 2025. Try G2 studies for the latest insights on Cursor.  

Code with confidence

Windsurf and Cursor are each highly effective AI coding assistants with distinctive strengths. Windsurf is superb for fast, low-friction coding assist throughout languages. Cursor, then again, presents a richer AI-driven modifying expertise; it’s like having a extremely superior pair programmer in its app.

Which one is healthier? 

It depends upon your use case and what issues to your workflow. On the finish of the day, select the instrument that streamlines your workflow and let the AI do the remaining.

Exploring methods to expedite coding? Try the 9 finest AI code turbines in the marketplace.  




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *