I Reviewed 8 Finest Applicant Monitoring Methods for 2025

The extra time I’ve spent working alongside HR groups, the extra I notice hiring is lots like advertising and marketing. It’s good to appeal to the correct viewers (candidates), nurture them by way of a pipeline (interview course of), and in the end convert them into loyal model advocates (workers).

However similar to advertising and marketing, the method rapidly falls aside with out the correct instruments (resumes slip by way of the cracks, communication breaks down, and high expertise strikes on).

That’s why I needed to take a better have a look at G2’s greatest applicant monitoring techniques (ATS). I used to be particularly targeted on discovering standard applicant monitoring options for HR groups, as a result of that’s the place many of the real-world hiring struggles I’ve seen are likely to occur. 

These platforms promise to assist recruiters and expertise groups keep organized, automate repetitive duties, and make hiring seamless. However which of them really ship?

Whether or not you’re working a tech startup, a fast-scaling firm, or a mid-sized group, these are a few of the high rated ATS for fast-growing tech companies that stood out throughout my analysis.

After evaluating over 25 instruments, listed here are the eight greatest ATS platforms that may remodel your hiring. Let’s get into it!

What units one of the best ATS aside? Right here’s what I discovered

Hiring isn’t nearly discovering the correct folks; it’s about managing the complete course of with out dropping momentum. A sluggish or clunky ATS system can value you high expertise, which is why selecting one of the best ATS software program is an enormous deal for recruiters and HR groups. That’s true whether or not you’re attempting to determine which firm affords one of the best applicant monitoring system or simply want a easy device that received’t sluggish your staff down.

It’s no shock then that 97.8% of Fortune 500 corporations use an ATS in 2025 to maintain their hiring pipelines organized. With out one, even the most important groups wrestle to handle quantity effectively.

However not all applicant monitoring techniques get it proper. Some enable you to monitor candidates, schedule interviews, and maintain hiring managers in sync. Others? They make issues tougher than they must be.

I reviewed one of the best ATS choices to seek out those that provide every thing, from automated resume screening to customized hiring workflows, and these instruments stood out for all the correct causes.

My standards for selecting the right ATS

The common recruiter is chargeable for about 30 hires monthly, a heavy workload that makes automation and usefulness essential. To place the funnel in perspective: the common function attracts 73 candidates, simply 3 are interviewed, and just one receives a suggestion. The very best ATS platforms assist recruiters zero in on these high candidates quicker, with out dropping monitor of the remaining

That’s why I targeted on platforms that scale back handbook effort and scale with demand. I thought of the next elements when evaluating one of the best applicant monitoring techniques.

• Intuitive candidate monitoring: A very good ATS system ought to make it straightforward to trace candidates at each stage, from preliminary utility to remaining supply. I checked out how properly every platform organizes candidate pipelines, how straightforward it’s to maneuver candidates by way of hiring levels, and whether or not the system gives clear, real-time standing updates. For corporations hiring in tech, particularly software program and improvement roles, I appeared intently at platforms that might work as one of the best ATS app for recruiting within the software program trade, the place candidate pipelines transfer quick.
• Automation that saves time: Recruiters and HR groups juggle numerous duties, so one of the best ATS reduces handbook work. I prioritized platforms that provide automated resume screening, interview scheduling, follow-up emails, and job posting distribution. A couple of platforms even mix automation and full-suite HR instruments, providing a few of the greatest recruiting software program with built-in ATS for groups attempting to simplify hiring with out sacrificing management.
• Integrations with HR and recruiting instruments: An ATS shouldn’t work in isolation. It ought to join with present instruments to create a clean hiring expertise. I targeted on platforms that combine properly with HRIS, payroll techniques, background test suppliers, job boards, and communication instruments like Slack and Gmail. I additionally evaluated how properly every platform handles integrations for service industries particularly, since lots of the main applicant monitoring techniques for service corporations want versatile workflows throughout completely different departments.
• Customizable hiring workflows: Each firm has a special hiring course of, so a one-size-fits-all applicant monitoring software program doesn’t minimize it. I appeared for platforms that permit HR groups to customise pipelines, add screening steps, arrange automated approvals, and create hiring scorecards to align with their recruitment wants. Instruments that pressure inflexible workflows didn’t make the minimize.
• Collaboration options: Hiring includes recruiters, hiring managers, and interview panels working collectively. Your ATS software program ought to make collaboration straightforward with shared candidate notes, interview suggestions varieties, and centralized communication so everybody stays on the identical web page.
• Compliance and information safety: Recruiting comes with strict authorized necessities, from EEO and GDPR compliance to information safety legal guidelines. I checked whether or not every ATS system consists of built-in compliance monitoring, role-based entry controls, and safe storage for delicate candidate data.
• Reporting and analytics: I prioritized platforms that provide detailed hiring stories, range metrics, and time-to-fill analytics. Good software program helps you measure what’s working, the place bottlenecks are, and easy methods to enhance recruitment methods over time. Stable reporting can also be essential for startups determining what is the high ATS software program for tech startups as they construct out hiring processes for the primary time

By all of this, I saved circling again to at least one core query I’ve heard from so many groups I’ve labored with: what’s the greatest applicant monitoring system for small companies that retains issues easy, helps hiring managers keep organized, and doesn’t require an enormous studying curve?

After breaking down every platform’s strengths, weaknesses, and key options, I’ve pulled collectively a listing that caters to a number of wants and use instances.

The record under comprises real person opinions from the applicant monitoring software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Acquire, type, and display resumes and any related candidate data
• Handle expertise swimming pools inside a customized workflow
• Allow communication between HR personnel, hiring supervisor, or recruiter and candidate

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions might have been edited for readability.

Based mostly on my overview of G2 person suggestions, Greenhouse simplifies recruitment workflows with instruments for candidate monitoring, staff collaboration, and seamless integrations with varied HR software program.

One function that I regularly see getting a whole lot of reward is ease of use. Customers usually spotlight the clear and logically structured interface, which makes navigation straightforward for hiring managers and recruiters. Monitoring candidates by way of completely different hiring levels feels seamless, with essential data readily accessible. Many G2 reviewers recognize the system’s capacity to facilitate collaboration by permitting a number of staff members to go away structured suggestions with out cluttering the method.

One other standout functionality, in accordance with customers, is strong integrations. Greenhouse integrates with all kinds of HR instruments, starting from background test suppliers to scheduling software program. G2 reviewers constantly point out that the mixing course of is simple, with out requiring extreme configurations or workarounds. This makes Greenhouse a great selection for corporations that depend on a number of instruments for various facets of the recruitment course of.

A generally appreciated aspect is reporting and analytics. Greenhouse’s customizable stories present deep insights into hiring developments, recruiter efficiency, and candidate pipelines. From my overview of G2 person suggestions, many customers worth the clear, data-driven metrics that assist enhance recruitment methods over time. Whether or not it is for a fast overview or extra detailed stories, customers observe that the system makes it straightforward to tug the numbers they want.

Nevertheless, customization tends to obtain combined suggestions. Some G2 customers really feel that whereas Greenhouse covers all of the important options, it lacks flexibility in areas like workflows and automatic actions. I’ve observed that for groups searching for a completely tailor-made ATS, this generally is a limitation, as they might must work inside the platform’s present constraints.

Moreover, candidate administration is some extent of frustration for some customers. Whereas the system does a very good job of retaining candidates organized, managing extra complicated hiring pipelines isn’t at all times clean. A number of reviewers point out that the search and filtering features may very well be improved, particularly when coping with massive applicant swimming pools.

That stated, Greenhouse continues to be one of the crucial extensively trusted ATS platforms, particularly for bigger groups that want construction and scalability. With a G2 score of 4.4 out of 5, it earns constant reward for its usability, integrations, and talent to maintain hiring workflows on monitor.

What I dislike about Greenhouse:

• I’ve come throughout suggestions mentioning that customization choices for workflows and automations really feel a bit restrictive, with customers wishing for extra flexibility to tailor hiring processes to particular wants.
• Managing candidates throughout a number of roles or complicated hiring wants appears to be a problem, as looking and filtering by way of massive volumes of candidates isn’t as refined as many customers count on.

What G2 customers dislike about Greenhouse:

“Trying to find candidates within the resume database is Greenhouse’s biggest weak spot. Whereas you are able to do a Boolean search and use filters, the displayed outcomes aren’t significantly useful. In the event that they added AI with pure language search, it will vastly enhance the expertise. Moreover, the workflow for reviewing candidates is to take a look at one resume at a time and both reject or advance them. It might be higher to slim down the record of candidates being reviewed earlier than going by way of this course of.”

– Greenhouse Evaluate, Invoice B.

From my overview of G2 person suggestions, BambooHR  affords a complete suite of HR instruments designed to streamline hiring and worker administration. It incorporates a user-friendly interface, a devoted cellular app for on-the-go entry, and an ATS that simplifies the recruitment course of.

One function that I regularly see getting a whole lot of reward is cellular accessibility. G2 customers recognize how the cellular app permits workers to test schedules, request time without work, and keep up to date without having a desktop. Many reviewers point out that this comfort of accessing HR instruments anytime, anyplace, considerably enhances each day operations.

One other generally appreciated aspect is BambooHR’s applicant monitoring system (ATS). Customers spotlight its capacity to simplify resume screening, monitor candidate progress, and schedule interviews. In response to suggestions I gathered, reviewers worth the way it organizes applicant information effectively, lowering the necessity for handbook monitoring. That is significantly helpful for hiring groups looking for a simple, well-structured ATS resolution.

When it comes to ease of use, BambooHR’s user-friendly interface stands out in opinions. Many G2 customers recognize how the platform makes navigation easy, even for non-tech-savvy people. The logical menu design and clear structure are constantly praised for making it straightforward to handle worker information or generate HR stories.

On the draw back, chat help tends to obtain some combined suggestions. A number of G2 customers point out that when dealing with technical difficulties or pressing queries, counting on e mail or cellphone help slows down the decision course of. 

Moreover, reporting and dashboard capabilities are sometimes identified as a limitation. I’ve seen G2 customers observe points with BambooHR’s fundamental analytics, noting that stories lack depth. A number of opinions point out that the restricted customization choices make it troublesome to generate extremely particular insights, which might hinder data-driven decision-making.

BambooHR stays a favourite for HR groups that worth simplicity and seamless onboarding. With a G2 score of 4.4 out of 5, it’s praised for its user-friendly design and all-in-one HR performance.

What I dislike about BambooHR:

• I’ve seen some customers categorical frustration with the real-time chat help function, as there are gaps that may make it tougher to get fast solutions when wanted, usually forcing reliance on slower e mail or cellphone help.
• Reporting capabilities are regularly talked about as restricted, with many customers discovering the customization choices restrictive when producing detailed analytics.

What G2 customers dislike about BambooHR:

“My greatest criticism about BambooHR is after I obtain e mail replies from Buyer Assist, they do not embody my unique e mail to them. I am a busy individual, as most HR execs are, and if an excessive amount of time goes by earlier than I get a reply, I typically overlook precisely what I wanted assist with. I actually cannot consider any complaints I’ve with the BambooHR system itself.”

– BambooHR Evaluate, Sandy Ok.

Based mostly on my overview of G2 person suggestions, JobDiva is acknowledged for integrating AI-powered options with strong information administration capabilities, serving to recruiters streamline sourcing, hiring, and monitoring candidates whereas sustaining a centralized database.

One function that I see getting a whole lot of reward is AI-powered candidate matching. The platform’s algorithm scans resumes and job descriptions to counsel high candidates, considerably lowering handbook search time. From the suggestions I gathered from G2 customers, many recognize how this automation permits recruiters to deal with participating with appropriate candidates, saving them hours of sifting by way of functions.

One other standout functionality, in accordance with customers, is centralized information administration. JobDiva centralizes all recruitment information, together with candidate historical past, job particulars, and communication logs, making it simpler for customers to trace hiring progress and revisit previous interactions. I’ve observed that G2 reviewers regularly spotlight the system’s structured strategy to organizing recruitment information, which ensures that necessary particulars are simply accessible and never misplaced within the course of.

Some customers have additionally highlighted JobDiva’s buyer help as a significant energy. A number of G2 opinions point out that the help staff is responsive and useful, resolving each minor and extra complicated points effectively. This degree of help is a generally appreciated aspect for recruiters who depend on seamless platform efficiency.

On the flip aspect, sluggish loading instances are a recurring theme within the G2 opinions. Some customers discover sure pages take longer to load than anticipated, which might turn into a bottleneck when working beneath tight deadlines.

Moreover, occasional lag and glitches have been identified in a number of G2 opinions. Customers have talked about that navigating particular options can typically lead to delays or minor bugs, which require refreshing the web page. Whereas this isn’t thought of a dealbreaker, I’ve observed that these points can hinder effectivity, particularly for customers managing a number of candidates without delay.

Nonetheless, JobDiva shines with its AI-driven candidate matching and centralized information administration. Holding a robust G2 score of 4.7 out of 5, it’s usually thought to be one of the crucial highly effective ATS options for staffing businesses and high-volume hiring.

What I dislike about JobDiva:

• I’ve observed that sluggish web page loading can typically be a difficulty, with delays when navigating between sections, which could be irritating throughout busy duties.
• I’ve skilled occasional lags or glitches on the platform, which could be disruptive, particularly when managing a number of candidates without delay.

What G2 customers dislike about JobDiva:

“When coping with a lot of information, typically it turns into somewhat bit sluggish, or the positioning will get down, particularly through the peak time.”

– JobDiva Evaluate, Sumit Ok.

From my evaluation of G2 person suggestions, Ceipal ATS is extensively appreciated for its ease of use. Many G2 customers spotlight how intuitive the interface is, making it straightforward to navigate between completely different recruitment features. Whether or not customers are trying to find candidates or managing job postings, the platform’s simplicity eliminates the necessity for intensive coaching, permitting recruiters to deal with hiring duties reasonably than mastering complicated software program.

One other function that G2 customers constantly reward is resume parsing. The platform successfully extracts key particulars from resumes and robotically organizes them into structured profiles. In response to suggestions, this function is a big time-saver, lowering handbook information entry and making certain that candidate data is constantly formatted, which improves the effectiveness of searches.

Candidate database group additionally receives optimistic suggestions. The flexibility to retailer, search, and retrieve candidate profiles effectively is a generally appreciated side. Reviewers point out how having all candidate data in a single place streamlines their workflow and reduces administrative duties, permitting recruiters to deal with engagement.

Nevertheless, I’ve seen some customers categorical points with efficiency velocity on G2. Some reviewers point out that processes like loading candidate profiles or working searches can take longer than anticipated. Whereas these delays aren’t a dealbreaker for many, they’ll turn into disruptive when working beneath tight deadlines.

One other level of suggestions I’ve come throughout on G2 is the restricted customization choices. Whereas Ceipal ATS covers the core recruitment wants, some G2 customers observe that the power to tailor workflows, stories, and search parameters is considerably restricted. This may very well be a difficulty for groups that require extra flexibility to adapt the platform to particular wants.

However, Ceipal ATS constantly impresses with its intuitive interface and superior resume parsing. Its G2 score of 4.6 out of 5reflects sturdy person satisfaction, particularly for recruiters managing massive applicant swimming pools.

What I dislike about Ceipal ATS:

• I’ve come throughout suggestions mentioning that the platform could be sluggish at instances, particularly when trying to find candidates or loading profiles, with customers sometimes having to attend longer than anticipated for outcomes.
• Many customers, together with myself, really feel that customization choices are considerably restricted, significantly in relation to stories and workflow changes, with a want for extra flexibility to tailor the system to particular wants.

What G2 customers dislike about Ceipal ATS:

“Typically the system runs slowly, inflicting delays in importing profiles. Moreover, I’m unsure about easy methods to contact buyer help if I encounter any technical points or errors with Ceipal ATS.”

– Ceipal ATS Evaluate, Dhivyashree J.

From my overview of G2 person suggestions, Lever is very regarded for its integrations, that are seen as considered one of its greatest benefits. Many G2 customers spotlight how seamlessly the platform connects with key recruitment instruments like LinkedIn RSC, enabling them to trace outreach and sync notes with out handbook intervention. Moreover, the Knowledge Explorer add-on is regularly praised for enhancing reporting capabilities, permitting customers to generate customized insights with ease.

One other standout function that I see getting a whole lot of reward is ease of implementation. G2 customers constantly point out how clean the onboarding course of is. The setup is described as easy, and lots of reviewers observe the proactive function performed by buyer help in making certain they have been up and working rapidly. The low want for intensive coaching throughout setup can also be appreciated by a number of customers.

Usability is one other space the place Lever receives optimistic suggestions. Many reviewers point out how the clear, fashionable interface makes navigation straightforward, which simplifies managing job postings, monitoring candidates, and reviewing stories. Based mostly on suggestions, the low studying curve stands out as a notable profit, permitting new customers to get snug with the system rapidly.

Nevertheless, I’ve come throughout issues round lag points. Some G2 customers level out that sure actions, like loading profiles or switching between views, can really feel sluggish at instances. Though these delays aren’t frequent, they’ll disrupt workflow at instances.

One other level of suggestions that I’ve observed on G2 is the use of various terminology. Whereas this doesn’t have an effect on performance, some G2 customers discover it barely complicated in comparison with the usual ATS terminology they’re used to. This adjustment interval could make the platform really feel much less intuitive for some customers at first.

Even with occasional lag and a slight studying curve round terminology, Lever stands out for its fashionable design, integrations, and built-in CRM options. With a G2 score of 4.3 out of 5, it stays a well-liked selection for collaborative hiring groups.

What I dislike about Lever:

• Occasional lag within the system is one thing I’ve seen some customers point out, particularly when switching between sections or loading candidate profiles, which might decelerate the method.
• Terminology changes generally is a hurdle, as I’ve personally discovered that it took a while to get used to sure phrases, particularly coming from a special area.

What G2 customers dislike about Lever:

“There may be not a great way to pause a candidate’s progress, particularly when a job goes on maintain or might be delayed however you are still sourcing candidates.”

– Lever Evaluate, Betsy Ok.

From my overview of G2 person suggestions, Zoho Recruit stands out for its customization capabilities. A constant theme in opinions is the platform’s customization choices, which permit customers to change modules and automate workflows. Many G2 reviewers spotlight how straightforward it’s to tailor recruitment processes to particular enterprise wants. This flexibility ensures that duties could be extra environment friendly and suited to every group’s distinctive workflow, with out counting on cumbersome workarounds.

I regularly see G2 reviewers point out recruitment administration as considered one of Zoho Recruit’s strengths. The platform centralizes candidate monitoring, interview scheduling, and collaboration, protecting each stage of the hiring course of. This reduces the necessity for exterior instruments, making it simpler to handle job postings and applicant progress. As soon as customers turn into conversant in the structure, many observe how the system simplifies these duties.

A generally appreciated aspect is buyer help. Customers constantly reward Zoho Recruit’s help staff for being responsive and useful. In response to suggestions from G2 customers, having fast help accessible is especially helpful through the preliminary setup section, easing the transition and serving to customers navigate the platform with minimal frustration.

Nevertheless, primarily based on my overview of G2 person suggestions, I’ve observed some customers point out a studying curve. Whereas Zoho Recruit affords strong options, many G2 reviewers level out that getting snug with all of the customization choices and settings takes time. New customers may have further onboarding earlier than they’ll absolutely benefit from the platform’s capabilities.

One other problem that regularly seems in G2 opinions is integration inconsistencies. Whereas Zoho Recruit integrates with varied third-party instruments, some customers observe that syncing with calendars or linking to different HR techniques doesn’t at all times operate easily. These occasional hiccups usually require handbook changes or workarounds, which might disrupt workflow effectivity.

Although the platform comes with a studying curve and occasional integration hiccups, Zoho Recruit is well-loved for its customization and automation capabilities. With a G2 score of 4.4 out of 5, it’s a flexible possibility for companies of all sizes, particularly small companies. 

What I dislike about Zoho Recruit:

• The system’s studying curve is one thing I’ve seen talked about by customers, because it took me a while to totally grasp all its options and customization settings.
• Integrations typically require further setup and changes, however as soon as configured correctly, I discovered that they labored properly inside the platform.

What G2 customers dislike about Zoho Recruit:

“Some extra superior options might require technical data, nevertheless new customers can begin with pre-configured templates to steadily be taught and discover the extra complicated options.”

– Zoho Recruit Evaluate, Paul O.

Based mostly on my overview of G2 person suggestions, HRone is usually seen as a flexible resolution for companies, providing a broad vary of HR instruments, from recruitment administration to payroll processing. A constant theme in opinions is its intuitive interface, which is appreciated for minimizing the educational curve for brand new customers.

Many G2 reviewers spotlight how straightforward it’s to handle job postings, monitor candidates, or deal with payroll, with the platform’s accessible structure making key features straightforward to find and lowering time spent on administrative duties.

I’ve observed that the feature-rich platform is one other side G2 customers regularly reward. HRone affords an intensive suite of HR instruments, together with attendance monitoring and efficiency administration. Many customers recognize how these varied features are built-in right into a single system, eliminating the necessity for a number of exterior instruments and making it simpler to handle end-to-end HR operations multi functional place.

One standout function that I see getting a whole lot of reward is payroll administration. Customers recognize how the system automates payroll calculations, lowering the chance of handbook errors and making certain well timed wage processing. That is usually seen as a significant time-saver and a key profit for companies managing payroll on a big scale.

Nevertheless, I’ve come throughout some combined suggestions round efficiency velocity. Some G2 customers point out that sure duties, equivalent to loading stories or switching between modules, can take longer than anticipated. Whereas these slowdowns aren’t constant, they’ll disrupt workflow effectivity, significantly throughout busy durations when time is of the essence. 

I’ve additionally seen some customers categorical points with information deletion choices. There doesn’t appear to be a technique to completely delete sure information, which may very well be a priority for corporations with strict information retention insurance policies. Many customers counsel {that a} extra versatile strategy to information deletion and archival can be helpful, permitting companies to raised handle their historic information.

Irrespective of those minor hiccups, , HROne delivers a sturdy all-in-one HR suite that simplifies recruitment and payroll. Its spectacular G2 score of 4.8 out of 5 highlights sturdy person confidence and satisfaction.

What I dislike about HROne:

•  I’ve seen customers point out system velocity, with some experiencing slowness when loading stories or switching between completely different features.
• Knowledge administration flexibility may very well be improved, as I’ve observed customers, together with myself, would recognize extra management over managing and archiving sure data.

What G2 customers dislike about HROne:

“No customization is allowed within the profile part. It’s troublesome to create method for the pay parts and you can also’t share paperwork greater than 50 mb file measurement.”

– HROne Evaluate, Gangaraju M.

From my overview of G2 person suggestions, Teamtailor is widely known for serving to recruiters handle functions effectively whereas providing a optimistic candidate expertise. One of many standout options that G2 reviewers constantly spotlight is automation. Customers recognize how the platform automates repetitive duties, equivalent to candidate screening and follow-up emails, which helps maintain communication constant and ensures no candidate is ignored. This protects recruiters time and permits them to focus extra on participating with candidates.

I regularly see G2 reviewers point out collaboration as a significant plus. The flexibility to share notes, tag staff members, and go away structured suggestions makes it simpler for hiring groups to work collectively inside the platform. Many customers spotlight how this eliminates the necessity for scattered emails or exterior messaging apps, streamlining communication and fostering smoother collaboration between hiring managers and recruiters.

One function that G2 customers actually recognize is branding capabilities. Teamtailor’s profession website builder permits corporations to create an interesting careers web page without having technical abilities. Reviewers usually reward the customization choices, which make it straightforward to align the profession website with an organization’s employer model, enhancing the general candidate expertise.

Nevertheless, primarily based on my overview of G2 person suggestions, the cellular expertise wants enchancment. Whereas the desktop model is usually praised for its ease of use, many customers point out that navigating the platform on cellular gadgets may very well be extra seamless. Duties like reviewing functions on the go could be extra cumbersome as a result of lack of cellular optimization, which some customers discover inconvenient.

Moreover, I’ve come throughout opinions mentioning occasional glitches. Whereas not main dealbreakers, customers have identified points equivalent to delays in loading candidate profiles or inconsistencies in CV parsing. These minor technical hiccups sometimes disrupt workflow and may benefit from additional enhancements to reinforce the platform’s total effectivity.

However Teamtailor wins recruiters over with branding capabilities and automation options that elevate the candidate expertise. With a G2 score of 4.6 out of 5, it’s acknowledged as a candidate-friendly ATS that scales with rising groups.

What I dislike about Teamtailor:

• The cellular model is not as clean because the desktop expertise, with some duties being tougher to finish on the go, in accordance with person suggestions.
• I’ve observed occasional glitches, equivalent to slow-loading candidate profiles, which some customers point out as a minor frustration.

What G2 customers dislike about Teamtailor:

“My solely critique can be that to entry the transcription function, the interview must be recorded, which I discover a bit pricey. In consequence, I had to make use of Tactiq for transcription and note-taking as an alternative.”

– Teamtailor Evaluate, Antonella S.

Discover this pricing information for applicant monitoring techniques to grasp the important thing elements to contemplate when selecting ATS instruments.

Interested by how your HR operations are performing? Discover HR analytics software program.

Harshita Tewari

Harshita is a Content material Advertising and marketing Specialist at G2. She holds a Grasp’s diploma in Biotechnology and has labored within the gross sales and advertising and marketing sector for meals tech and journey startups. Presently, she focuses on writing content material for the ERP persona, protecting matters like power administration, IP administration, course of ERP, and vendor administration. In her free time, she could be discovered snuggled up together with her pets, writing poetry, or in the midst of a Netflix binge.