10 Actors With Horrible Rotten Tomatoes Streaks

No performer likes to obtain a thumbs-down for his or her work, however think about the way it feels when this can be a actuality for a prolonged time period. For some actors, they launched into horrible Rotten Tomatoes streaks that weren’t type to their careers. Now, keep in mind that Rotten Tomatoes is not the be-all and end-all of a movie’s high quality, but it surely’s a device utilized by many to see what is the general consensus from the critics. Along with this, whereas the aggregator did not exist earlier than the ’90s, it nonetheless collects the large opinions from bygone eras to showcase what the essential ideas have been of main productions.

Commercial

So, for this characteristic, it is time to head again in time to take a look at the foremost actors who acquired rotten rankings for a notable stretch of their careers. To make life simpler right here, although, movies that have not formally acquired the “rotten” or “recent” label — as a result of there aren’t sufficient opinions counted — have been excluded from the equation. So, in case your favourite appeared in a misplaced indie darling that solely two folks watched however nobody reviewed, take into account it a win.

It is value mentioning once more, since parts of the web neighborhood lose their collective minds over opinions and Rotten Tomatoes: It is okay to love or love movies that almost all critics do not. In actual fact, most of those actors dried their tears with the wads of cash they acquired for these supposedly dangerous motion pictures. With that stated, let’s try the actors with horrible Rotten Tomatoes streaks.

Commercial

Sylvester Stallone thought “First Blood” would wreck his profession, but it surely did the alternative. After “Rocky,” it grew to become one other career-defining franchise for Sly. He was cash, and Hollywood wished a bit of the motion. But, his profession post-1982 till 1993 is an onslaught of dangerous opinions, with the one-two of “Cliffhanger” and “Demolition Man” lastly breaking the curse.

Commercial

What’s stunning about Sly’s horrible Rotten Tomatoes streak is what number of fan-favorite movies exist on this interval. Each “Rambo: First Blood Half II” (33%) and “Rambo III” (41%) have been launched, as have been the hard-hitting “Rocky IV” (39%) and super-stylish “Cobra” (32%). Positive, the “Rambo” sequels aren’t wherever pretty much as good as the unique film, however they have been strong 6/10 motion pictures at greatest — anybody who disagrees can kick rocks. Equally, “Rocky IV” is fondly remembered for Ivan Drago being probably the greatest villains within the franchise, although it did not obtain the love of its predecessors. “Cobra” is, effectively, “Cobra,” with each man wanting to decorate and act as cool as Marion Cobretti.

These initiatives apart, nobody can argue the essential battering that options like “Over the High” (32%), “Rocky V” (32%), “Tango & Money” (31%), “Oscar” (12%), and “Cease! Or My Mother Will Shoot” (14%) took. These motion pictures are widely known because the worst in Sly’s profession, with the latter being certainly one of Hollywood’s best troll strikes courtesy of Arnold Schwarzenegger. Since then, Stallone has had a number of different wobbly streaks, however nothing as dangerous because the ’80s and early ’90s.

Commercial

Megan Fox rose to prominence and fame across the mid-2000s. Regardless of the fanfare surrounding her on the time, the critics weren’t in her nook. From 2004 till 2011, Fox did not star in a single “licensed recent” movie. To be honest, although, the typical particular person would possibly agree that Fox’s movies on this interval have been typically subpar or mediocre, so there cannot be too many bitter grapes about it.

Commercial

The streak begins with the unburdening of “Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen” (14%). Then it continues along with her breakout function as Mikaela Barnes within the all-out Bayhem of “Transformers” (57%) earlier than transferring to the forgettable “Find out how to Lose Associates & Alienate Individuals” (36%) and the horrid sequel “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” (19%). Sadly, the true cult traditional “Jennifer’s Physique” (46%) finds itself included right here, whereas “Jonah Hex” (12%) and “Ardour Play” (3%) add a pleasant eau de trout to anybody’s filmography.

This is the kicker, although: 2011’s “Associates with Children” breaks up the horrible Rotten Tomatoes streak, coming in with a good 66%. Nonetheless, Fox goes proper again to purely rotten motion pictures till 2019 with movies like “The Dictator” (57%), “This Is 40” (52%), “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” (21%), and “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows” (38%). It is wild to assume that one mainstream actor has had extra misses than hits for such a stretch. Thankfully, it seems as if Fox’s fortunes have modified in current instances, with at the very least a number of extra recent motion pictures than typical.

Commercial

Nobody possesses a profession fairly like John Travolta. his historical past on Rotten Tomatoes, it is nothing wanting shambles and puzzling. For each “Carrie” or “Pulp Fiction,” there is a slew of putrid stinkers like “Battlefield Earth” or “Gotti.” He is not simply an actor who has had one horrible Rotten Tomatoes streak however a number of.

Commercial

A notable one came about within the ’80s, kicking off with the 0%-rated “Staying Alive.” This snaked its approach all through the last decade, touching every little thing from “Two of a Sort” (18%), “Excellent” (18%), “Appears to be like Who’s Speaking” (56%), then extending its attain into the ’90s for “Look Who’s Speaking Too” (13%), “Shout” (20%), and “Look Who’s Speaking Now” (0%). Lastly, the streak ended with 1994’s “Pulp Fiction” (92%), whereas Travolta see-sawed between a string of hits and misses for the subsequent few years.

The dangerous luck struck once more in 1999 after “The Normal’s Daughter” (22%) and continued till 2007’s “Hairspray” (92%). These eight years characteristic a few of the best misfires in film historical past, together with “Battlefield Earth” (3%), “Home Disturbance” (23%), the aptly titled “Fundamental” (21%), and the uncool “Be Cool” (30%). The streak hasn’t actually recovered since then both, as one or two of his movies would possibly break up the monotony of rotten rankings, however Travolta’s initiatives proceed to circle the drain of relevancy. Lately, he is starred in a number of 0% movies, corresponding to “Life on the Line,” “Gotti,” “Velocity Kills,” “Buying and selling Level,” and “The Poison Rose.” Ouch.

Commercial

Previous to venturing into cinema, Jason Momoa lower his tooth within the tv world, showing in acknowledged reveals like “Baywatch: Hawaii,” “Stargate Atlantis,” and “Sport of Thrones.” Momoa’s Hollywood profession kicked into excessive gear when he was solid because the titular character in 2011’s “Conan the Barbarian” reboot. Regardless of Momoa definitely having the search for Conan, the movie did not present the life-changing function he may need imagined, because it solely garnered a 25% essential approval rating. It additionally marked the beginning of an undesirable Rotten Tomatoes dangerous streak for Momoa, as he tried to determine himself as a key participant within the trade.

Commercial

After “Conan,” Momoa’s subsequent motion pictures did not elevate his fame. He appeared in “Bullet to the Head” (45%), “Highway to Paloma” (54%), “Wolves” (16%), “Sugar Mountain” (36%), “The Dangerous Batch” (45%), and “As soon as Upon a Time in Venice” (21%). Then it was “Justice League” — or ought to I say “Josstice League”? — which assembled a 39% rating and proved to be the start of the tip for the SnyderVerse.

After such a horrid run, one feared that Momoa might have been relegated to the kind of motion motion pictures which have the finances of a rooster mayonnaise baguette. The actor fought again, although, with a sequence of positively reviewed movies like “Braven, “Aquaman,” “Zack Snyder’s Justice League,” and “Dune” to reveal he deserves his place among the many prime stars in Hollywood. Though the chance of “Conan 2” ever occurring with him returning because the hero is subsequent to nothing.

Commercial

Across the flip of the millennium, Devon Sawa established himself as one of many hottest younger actors of his technology. But, regardless of essential roles in “Idle Fingers” and “Closing Vacation spot” placing him on the map and turning him right into a scream king of horror motion pictures, his movies weren’t warmly acquired by critics. Because it seems, it was the start of a two-decade run of damaging scores on Rotten Tomatoes for Sawa.

Commercial

“Idle Fingers” ignited the match with 18%, adopted by the (unfair) burn of “Closing Vacation spot” at 40%. After “The Responsible” (40%), “Slackers” (10%), and “Excessive Ops” (7%) set flames to his filmography on Rotten Tomatoes, Sawa’s Hollywood profile took a significant dip thereafter, as he popped up in lesser-known motion pictures and misplaced the sheen of a teen idol. The smaller-budget productions did not enhance his fortunes both, as movies like “The Fanatic” and “Life on the Line” yielded 15% and 0% respectively.

At this level, it seemed like Dying’s grasp plan was to punish Sawa with an infinite and cruel assault of dangerous scores on Rotten Tomatoes for daring to mess up its design in “Closing Vacation spot,” however Sawa broke the spell in 2020 with “Hunter Hunter” (94%). Since then, he is had a number of extra hits within the type of “Black Friday” (65%) and “Coronary heart Eyes” (81%). That being stated, it is thoughts blowing to think about that he is an actor who did not have a single recent hit for over 20 years!

Commercial

Look, Freddie Prinze Jr. isn’t any Marlon Brando. On the peak of his fame, he blended in properly with the teen-friendly movies round him. So, positive, he is removed from a generational expertise, however he is not Tom Inexperienced, proper? That being stated, are you aware what number of of Prinze’s movies fall on the constructive aspect of Rotten Tomatoes’ Tomatometer? Two. The primary is 1997’s “The Home of Sure” (62%) and 2022’s “Christmas with You” (65%).

Commercial

Every thing else in between is rotten to the core. “I Know What You Did Final Summer season” could be seen as a seminal ’90s slasher, but it surely solely acquired a 48% essential approval score. Its sequel, “I Nonetheless Know What You Did Final Summer season,” did not fare higher both, receiving an abysmal 7%. Prinze’s time as the final word rom-com boyfriend did not endear his to critics too, as “She’s All That” (41%), “All the way down to You” (3%), “Boys and Ladies” (11%), and “Summer season Catch” (8%) resulted in additional mehs than merriment.

The actor had the prospect to strut his stuff in different high-profile productions too, however the consequence was the identical. “Wing Commander” crash-landed at 10%, whereas “Scooby-Doo” and “Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed” was a ruh-oh at 32% and 22% respectively. At one level within the 2000s, Warner Bros. killed Darren Aronofsky’s Batman film as a result of the studio wished Prinze within the lead and the filmmaker wished Joaquin Phoenix. For those who go by the information right here, it is greater than doubtless that Prinze would have had one other rotten challenge so as to add to his ever-growing record.

Commercial

Very like her husband, Freddie Prinze Jr., Sarah Michelle Gellar would not have an envious Rotten Tomatoes observe file. In fact, there’s an argument to be made that she’s greatest remembered for her celebrated tv work as Buffy Summers in “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” and hasn’t featured in lots of movies since 2013, however a streak is a streak. And the reality is Gellar’s freshest hit stays 1997’s “Scream 2.”

Commercial

In the identical yr she starred in “Scream 2,” she additionally lent her abilities to “I Know What You Did Final Summer season,” however the essential reception paled compared to the 82% she acquired for dodging Ghostface’s knife (albeit unsuccessfully ultimately). Two years later, Gellar starred in “Merely Irresistible” and “Merciless Intentions.” The latter grew to become one thing of a cult traditional, but it surely solely mustered 54% on the Tomatometer, whereas “Merely Irresistible” proved to be something however with 16%.

The 2000s weren’t any higher for Gellar. “Harvard Man” failed with 33%, whereas the “Scooby-Doo” sequels would have gotten away with it if it weren’t for these meddling critics. “The Grudge” and “The Grudge 2” had completely nothing on the unique “Ju-On” motion pictures, whereas Gellar’s voice efficiency as April O’Neil could not save 2007’s “TMNT” from a shell-shocking 36%, nor might anybody flip the tide for “Southland Tales” (41%). All issues thought-about, it is unlikely that these flops hassle Gellar an excessive amount of, particularly making an allowance for how she carved her title into popular culture historical past with “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.”

Commercial

Anybody with the mesmerizing “Gigli” of their filmography goes to obtain slack — and rightfully so, since it is a field workplace flop that put its creator in director jail. In Jennifer Lopez’s case, although, “Gigli” wasn’t the beginning of one thing terrible — “turkey time” simply so occurred to be in the course of it. Previous to 2019’s “Hustlers,” Lopez was on a horrible Rotten Tomatoes streak since 1998’s “Antz.”

Commercial

She could not catch a break within the early 2000s, as “The Cell” (45%), “The Wedding ceremony Planner” (17%), “Angel Eyes” (32%), “Sufficient” (22%), and “Maid in Manhattan” (38%) primed her for the disasterpiece that was “Gigli” (6%). It did not get any higher from there, as Lopez suffered with the likes of “Jersey Lady” (42%), “Shall We Dance?” (47%), and “Monster in Legislation” (19%), and the 2000s weren’t even carried out but.

The 2010s have been hardly something to jot down house about both. Lopez stumbled from “The Again-up Plan” (17%) to “What to Count on When You are Anticipating” (23%) and quite a lot of forgettable animated motion pictures like “Ice Age: Continental Drift” (37%), “Ice Age: Collision” (18%), and “Dwelling” (53%). Even the nice Jason Statham might do nothing to assist her forestall “Parker” from flopping to 41%. “Hustlers” (88%) proved to be a constructive turning level for Lopez, as she’s achieved a number of hits since then with the odd dud, such because the ghastly “Atlas” (19%), scattered in between.

Commercial

It is outrageous that Eddie Murphy’s title options on this record, particularly after the items he offered humanity within the type of characters like Axel Foley from “Beverly Hills Cop” and Donkey from “Shrek.” But, Murphy is not resistant to a rotten streak or two. In actual fact, he is had a number of he want to neglect, however his most memorable one stretched from 1989 to 1996.

Commercial

After 1988’s “Coming to America,” Murphy’s movies did not strike a wire with critics. “Harlem Nights” downed itself at 27%, whereas “One other 48 Hrs.” — the buddy cop sequel to a fan-favorite movie starring Murphy and Nick Nolte — crashed at simply 19%. “Boomerang” solely whacked itself on the aspect of the pinnacle at 49%, whereas “The Distinguished Gentleman” sank to 13%.

Tragically, the subsequent two Murphy motion pictures acquired a common thumbs-down, even when they could be seen by a distinct set of eyes these days (or at the very least by this writer). “Beverly Hills Cop III” was handcuffed at 10%, whereas “Vampire in Brooklyn” had its fangs shaved all the way down to 11%. So, what pulled Murphy out of this rut? It was “The Nutty Professor” (64%), a film that Ryan Reynolds believes Eddie Murphy ought to have gained an Oscar for.

Commercial

The Muscle tissues from Brussels owned the late ’80s and early ’90s, however Jean-Claude Van Damme hit a bumpy patch after 1993’s “Arduous Goal.” Possibly it is as a result of he went so “arduous” in that film — particularly together with his superb mullet — that he struggled to hit those self same Rotten Tomatoes-approved highs till 2008.

Commercial

Proper after “Arduous Goal,” JCVD starred in “Avenue Fighter,” which could be certainly one of the very best ‘so-bad-it’s-good’ motion pictures of all time, however that did not cease it from getting KO’d with 11% on the Tomatometer. “Timecop” did not precisely electrify both with 42%, and neither did “Sudden Dying” at 51% (although this “Die Arduous” clone deserves much more reward than it will get). The second half of the ’90s adopted the identical sample, with “Most Danger” (34%), “The Quest” (14%), “Double Crew” (11%), “Legionnaire” (29%), “Knock Off” (10%), and “Common Soldier: The Return” (5%) struggling to realize any substantial essential approval.

By the beginning of 2000s, Van Damme’s fame suffered, as he entered the full-blown straight-to-DVD period of his profession. “Replicant” staggered to 30%, “The Order” hobbled round at 13%, and “Derailed” acquired a straight 0% score. It may need seemed like hopeless then, however the actor roundhouse kicked his approach again to the highest and freed from a horrible Rotten Tomatoes streak with 2008’s “JCVD” (82%). Ethical of the story: By no means doubt a person who can do the splits and survive.

Commercial